There are two motivations for this: 1. It looks like we're going to add other features that require server-side storage (e.g. user notes). 2. Namespacing glitchsoc modifications is a good idea anyway: even if we do not end up doing (1), if upstream introduces a keyword-mute feature that also uses a "KeywordMute" model, we can avoid some merge conflicts this way and work on the more interesting task of choosing which implementation to use.
		
			
				
	
	
		
			8 lines
		
	
	
		
			98 B
		
	
	
	
		
			Ruby
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			8 lines
		
	
	
		
			98 B
		
	
	
	
		
			Ruby
		
	
	
	
	
	
# frozen_string_literal: true
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
module Glitch
 | 
						|
  def self.table_name_prefix
 | 
						|
    'glitch_'
 | 
						|
  end
 | 
						|
end
 |