Merge branch 'main' into glitch-soc/merge-upstream

Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
  Upstream changed how docker images were built, including how
  they were cached.
  I don't know much about it, so applied upstream's changes.
- `app/controllers/admin/domain_blocks_controller.rb`:
  The feature, that was in glitch-soc, got backported upstream.
  It also had a few fixes upstream, so those have been ported!
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
  Glitch-soc changes have been backported upstream. As a result,
  some code from `app/javascript/core/admin.js` got added upstream.
  Kept our version since our shared Javascript already has that feature.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
  Upstream added something to distinguish unusable and unusable-because-moved
  accounts, while glitch-soc considers moved accounts usable.
  Took upstream's code for `functional_or_moved?` and made `functional?`
  call it.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
  Upstream cleaned up code style a bit, on a line that we had custom changes
  for.
  Applied upstream's change while keeping our change.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
  Upstream adopted one CSP directive we already had.
  The conflict is because of our files being structurally different, but the
  change itself was already part of glitch-soc.
  Kept our version.
This commit is contained in:
Claire
2022-11-17 11:55:50 +01:00
47 changed files with 184 additions and 84 deletions

View File

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ RSpec.describe FavouriteService, type: :service do
let(:status) { Fabricate(:status, account: bob) }
before do
stub_request(:post, "http://example.com/inbox").to_return(:status => 200, :body => "", :headers => {})
stub_request(:post, "http://example.com/inbox").to_return(status: 200, body: "", headers: {})
subject.call(sender, status)
end

View File

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ RSpec.describe FollowService, type: :service do
let(:bob) { Fabricate(:account, username: 'bob', domain: 'example.com', protocol: :activitypub, inbox_url: 'http://example.com/inbox') }
before do
stub_request(:post, "http://example.com/inbox").to_return(:status => 200, :body => "", :headers => {})
stub_request(:post, "http://example.com/inbox").to_return(status: 200, body: "", headers: {})
subject.call(sender, bob)
end

View File

@@ -76,7 +76,25 @@ RSpec.describe VerifyLinkService, type: :service do
context 'when a link does not contain a link back' do
let(:html) { '' }
it 'marks the field as verified' do
it 'does not mark the field as verified' do
expect(field.verified?).to be false
end
end
context 'when link has no `href` attribute' do
let(:html) do
<<-HTML
<!doctype html>
<head>
<link type="text/html" rel="me" />
</head>
<body>
<a rel="me" target="_blank">Follow me on Mastodon</a>
</body>
HTML
end
it 'does not mark the field as verified' do
expect(field.verified?).to be false
end
end