Merge branch 'main' into glitch-soc/merge-upstream

Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
  Upstream switched to pushing to both DockerHub and GitHub Container
  Repository, while glitch-soc was already pushing to the latter only.
  Updated our configuration to be slightly more consistent with upstream's
  naming and styling, but kept our behavior.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
  Updated dependencies textually too close to glitch-soc only hcaptcha
  dependency.
  Updated dependencies as upstream did.
- `README.md`:
  Upstream updated its README, but we have a completely different one.
  Kept our README, though it probably should be reworked at some point.
- `app/views/auth/sessions/two_factor.html.haml`:
  Minor style fix upstream that's on a line glitch-soc removed because
  of its different theming system.
  Kept our file as is.
- `spec/controllers/health_controller_spec.rb`:
  This file apparently did not exist upstream, upstream created it with
  different contents but it is functionally the same.
  Switched to upstream's version of the file.
- `spec/presenters/instance_presenter_spec.rb`:
  Upstream changed the specs around `GITHUB_REPOSITORY`, while glitch-soc
  had its own code because it's a fork and does not have the same default
  source URL.
  Took upstream's change, but with glitch-soc's repo as the default case.
- `yarn.lock`:
  Upstream dependencies textually too close to a glitch-soc only one.
  Updated dependencies as upstream did.

spec/models/admin/appeal_filter_spec.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe Admin::AppealFilter do
+  describe '#results' do
+    let(:approved_appeal) { Fabricate(:appeal, approved_at: 10.days.ago) }
+    let(:not_approved_appeal) { Fabricate(:appeal, approved_at: nil) }
+
+    it 'returns filtered appeals' do
+      filter = described_class.new(status: 'approved')
+
+      expect(filter.results).to eq([approved_appeal])
+    end
+  end
+end

spec/models/form/admin_settings_spec.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe Form::AdminSettings do
+  describe 'validations' do
+    describe 'site_contact_username' do
+      context 'with no accounts' do
+        it 'is not valid' do
+          setting = described_class.new(site_contact_username: 'Test')
+          setting.valid?
+
+          expect(setting).to model_have_error_on_field(:site_contact_username)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'with an account' do
+        before { Fabricate(:account, username: 'Glorp') }
+
+        it 'is not valid when account doesnt match' do
+          setting = described_class.new(site_contact_username: 'Test')
+          setting.valid?
+
+          expect(setting).to model_have_error_on_field(:site_contact_username)
+        end
+
+        it 'is valid when account matches' do
+          setting = described_class.new(site_contact_username: 'Glorp')
+          setting.valid?
+
+          expect(setting).to_not model_have_error_on_field(:site_contact_username)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end

spec/models/form/status_filter_batch_action_spec.rb

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe Form::StatusFilterBatchAction do
+  describe '#save!' do
+    it 'does nothing if status_filter_ids is empty' do
+      batch_action = described_class.new(status_filter_ids: [])
+
+      expect(batch_action.save!).to be_nil
+    end
+  end
+end